<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bosc pear 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shiftingpixel.com/2005/12/12/bosc-pear-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shiftingpixel.com/2005/12/12/bosc-pear-3/</link>
	<description>Best damn photos in the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:31:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: josh</title>
		<link>http://shiftingpixel.com/2005/12/12/bosc-pear-3/comment-page-1/#comment-371</link>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 05:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shiftingpixel.com/?p=269#comment-371</guid>
		<description>This is my favorite of the Bosc pear series thusfar. You nailed the DoF (in my opinion), and the lighting is perfect. Nice shot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is my favorite of the Bosc pear series thusfar. You nailed the DoF (in my opinion), and the lighting is perfect. Nice shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Lencioni</title>
		<link>http://shiftingpixel.com/2005/12/12/bosc-pear-3/comment-page-1/#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Lencioni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 00:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shiftingpixel.com/?p=269#comment-370</guid>
		<description>thanks frisky, and an astute observation. As a matter of fact, I love depth of field.

A side note: all of the &lt;acronym title=&quot;depth of field&quot;&gt;DoF&lt;/acronym&gt; stuff you see in this series is from the long focal length and the wide aperture and is not done in Photoshop. :) But, not that it would make any difference to me... I just think it is cool being able to do it with the hardware rather than the software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks frisky, and an astute observation. As a matter of fact, I love depth of field.</p>
<p>A side note: all of the <acronym title="depth of field">DoF</acronym> stuff you see in this series is from the long focal length and the wide aperture and is not done in Photoshop. <img src='http://shiftingpixel.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  But, not that it would make any difference to me&#8230; I just think it is cool being able to do it with the hardware rather than the software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frisky?</title>
		<link>http://shiftingpixel.com/2005/12/12/bosc-pear-3/comment-page-1/#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>frisky?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 18:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shiftingpixel.com/?p=269#comment-369</guid>
		<description>good series. u like working with DoF dont you? :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good series. u like working with DoF dont you? <img src='http://shiftingpixel.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
